During the tutorials earlier Nigel said we need to have a group name that links all our work together. Although our outcomes are very different, a theme of communication is reoccuring in some of our work. Does anyone have any suggests? It's more difficult than it sounds, however one of the groups have named themselves processes, as they all produce work in that way.
(I don't like posting a blog without a picture so hope you all appreciate this random picture of David MEOWIE! )
There seems to be mixed messages about this though as I'm sure Kate said that if our work fits better with someone not in our group then that's ok too...?
ReplyDeleteIm finding it hard to think of a name that encapsulates all our work, I have some words to throw into the mix, just to kick us off thinking.....
ReplyDeleteengaging the essence
amplify
commemorate
correspond
transmission
Yes I was sure Kate said we didn't need one and whats the reason to have one if we aren't having a work put up together?
ReplyDeleteI like TRANSMISSION :)
What about
articulate
each others eyes
mixed cocktail
the city
hungry for the mc
I am so knocked out by David Meowie, my brain has no room for names! Ok serious now, I like “Engaging the essence” – thesaurus meanings:- life blood, substance, core, heart, crux, kernel, soul, quintessence, principle. Most of these are applicable to the city and how each of us sees it.
ReplyDeletei also really like transmission! crux sounds quite cool as well, the definition is nice: "a vital, basic, decisive, or pivotal point". all of our work is kind of about people, i reckon this could apply??
ReplyDeleteI really like the suggestions everyone has come up with! Maybe we should double check with both Kate and Nigel when we both see them then. Does everyone have a name for their own work?
ReplyDelete